top of page

The Red Sea Crisis: An Artery Under Attack

Red Sea Crisis
Red Sea Crisis

The Red Sea is one of the most critical maritime chokepoints in the global economy, an artery facilitating over $1 trillion in trade each year. This narrow passage is a gateway connecting Asia, Europe and Africa, with over 10% of total seaborne cargo and 30% of global container volumes transiting through annually.

However, this vital channel is now under attack. Iran-backed Houthi rebels based in Yemen have unleashed a barrage of drone and missile strikes on commercial vessels sailing through the Red Sea towards the Suez Canal. Major firms like AP Moller-Maersk, MSC, CMA CGM and Hapag Lloyd have already suspended sailing through these volatile waters.

The impacts of these shipping disruptions on global supply chains, inflation and geopolitical tensions could be severe if the crisis escalates further. This analysis examines the importance of Red Sea shipping, the economic risks from its disruption and the outlook for the maritime industry.

Why the Red Sea Matters?

The Red Sea passage provides the shortest trade route connecting Asia to Europe, entering the Mediterranean through the Suez Canal. Avoiding this narrow corridor means diverting ships around the southern tip of Africa, adding around 15 days to the journey. This can cost over $1 million more per voyage in fuel and operating expenses alone.

For the energy sector, this is also a critical juncture – over 8% of global oil and LNG volumes flow through the maritime chokepoints around the Red Sea. Disrupting these shipments could impact energy supplies to key markets and drive up prices.

The Suez Canal itself also lacks capacity to easily accommodate traffic diverted from the Red Sea, with ripple effects across ports worldwide if schedules descend into chaos.

Impacts of the Houthi Attacks

The Houthis’ attacks have been indiscriminate, targeting a wide range of vessels from oil tankers to container ships and bulk carriers. The strikes have involved anti-ship missiles, armed drones, waterborne IEDs and speedboat raids.


Publicly available reports indicate around 50 attacks by the Houthis on commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea between 19 October 2022 and 4 January 2024. The attacks remain an ongoing threat to shipping in the region.

This persistent insecurity has driven up operating costs and risks, with major implications:

a)      Soaring Shipping Rates

- Insurance premiums for Red Sea transits have surged 10x to 0.5% of a ship’s value, adding hundreds of thousands in costs.

- Longer alternate routes also burn more fuel, crew time and reduce schedules integrity. Freight rates to Europe and North America are up over 50%.

b)      Goods Shortages and Inflation Worries

- Importers face higher landed costs, with consumers likely to eventually feel the pinch through more expensive goods and shortages as supply chains unravel. 

- After months of moderation, the crisis risks rekindling inflation and worrying central banks.

c)       Supply Chain Chaos

- The lack of schedule reliability with slower, rerouted vessels strains ports and connecting rail/truck legs, impacting inventories and production.

- Congestion at chokepoints like the Cape route and Suez Canal will cascade through the whole system.

d)      Geopolitical Tensions

- The US and allies launched a naval coalition to escort commercial ships, risking conflict with Iranian-backed Houthi forces. Wider military intervention may follow if attacks escalate.

What is the Market Outlook?

The economic impacts depend heavily on how long major container lines and energy firms continue avoiding the Red Sea and if threats persist. But the crisis will likely get worse before it gets better.

The Houthi forces show no signs of relenting, perhaps seeing this as an opportunity to improve their bargaining position in the stalled civil war peace process. Iran also seems willing to tolerate further escalation to stress rival Gulf states.

Meanwhile the naval coalition’s deterrence remains untested. Many consumer goods importers and manufacturers face thinning inventories and production constraints as delays mount.

Central banks also worry the supply chain crunch could rekindle inflationary pressures. Yet hiking interest rates too aggressively while economic headwinds mount may tip major economies into recession.

For maritime firms, the situation means upside for battered shipping rates but downside from spiraling insurance costs, fuel consumption and reduced schedules integrity. The Cape route around South Africa is getting overwhelmed with diverted traffic.

Oil and gas flows face potential disruption too if Middle East energy exports get embroiled in regional tensions. Agricultural commodity trade may also suffer from strained dry bulk capacity and heightened war risk insurance premiums. 

All in all, the Red Sea crisis creates a new and severe supply chain disruption just as previous troubles faded. The economic impacts may spread widely if the key artery of global trade continues hemorrhaging.

Consequences Ripple Through Maritime Supply Chains

The Red Sea shipping attacks have sent destructive ripples through global supply chains and markets, with no clear resolution in sight. Major container lines and energy firms continue avoiding this crucial passage out of security fears, despite a naval coalition's interventions.

These extensive re-routings and suspended sailings are not only hitting shipping companies’ bottom lines. The economic impacts now propagate through interconnected supply chains, leaving consumers, commodities traders and manufacturers increasingly exposed.

Uncertainty for Ship owners and operators

For maritime transportation providers on the frontlines, the Houthi attacks mean extreme volatility. Red Sea insurance premiums exceeding $500,000 per voyage have eroded profitability for container shipping firms like Maersk and MSC.

Many bulk carriers and oil tankers are also avoiding hotspots like the Bab El Mandeb strait, even with heightened naval patrols. These extensive diversions around Africa’s Cape add 2-3 weeks to trips bound for Europe.

Such delays play havoc with schedules and cascading port congestion. Bunker fuel costs also mount due to the thousands of extra miles. Yet skipping the Suez Canal risks losing precious Asian import cargo.

The crisis has at least fueled a partial recovery in battered shipping spot rates, especially on the Cape route. But operational headaches keep mounting, while insurance pay-outs may still fall short.

Importers Face Inventory Pinches

For retailers and manufacturers dependent on Asian imports, the shipping diversions mean inventory shortages loom. Whether the goods move via the Suez Canal or around the Cape, most container transit times from China have already doubled from 30 days pre-pandemic to 60-90 days.

Further Red Sea snarls to the critical Asia-Europe route will strain inventory buffers and production cycles even more. Automakers like Toyota and Volkswagen already face shortfalls of critical parts, while consumer goods from apparel to electronics are also at risk.  

These inventory pinches heighten inflation worries despite recent moderation. Even the US Federal Reserve shows concern over the supply chain impacts, especially if energy costs also spike.

Ripple Effects Through Commodities

Agricultural traders are also watching nervously, as the shipping crisis strains globally interlinked grain markets. Ukraine’s returning wheat exports depend on dry bulk ships traversing through the Black Sea and Mediterranean via the Suez Canal.

But carriers are increasingly reluctant to sail these waters given widening war insurance zones, reduced capacity, inflated costs and delays. Countries like Egypt and Yemen where food costs bear heavily on consumers are especially exposed.    

For oil and gas markets, the risks appear more muted so far as major Mideast exporters avoid the Red Sea chaos. But energy ships still face broader pressures from rising war insurance rates across the region. Traders brace for volatility if Yemen tensions stir wider conflict.

Across commodities, the inflamed geopolitics and supply chain troubles form a toxic brew for prices and food security. Despite the naval coalition’s efforts, the Red Sea remains a risk epicenter radiating global uncertainty.

Are there are any positive offsets from this situation for Ship owners and Operators?

Longer Journeys Around Africa Boost Ton-Mile Demand But Add Costs

The Houthi rebel attacks on commercial ships transiting the Red Sea have sparked an exodus of container lines, tankers and bulk carriers now opting to divert around the Cape of Good Hope. This avoidance of the crucial Suez trade artery is lengthening voyage distances and inflating shipping demand measured in ton-miles. But the longer journeys also pile on fuel bills and other expenses while slowing transit times.

Why Ton-Miles Matter?

Ton-miles represent cargo volume multiplied by transport distance, encapsulating total shipping service needs. More ton-miles mean greater revenue opportunities for vessel owners as contract and spot freight rates often rise in tight markets with ballooning demand.

Diverting ships around Africa's southern tip adds around 7,000 extra nautical miles to a typical Asia-Europe round voyage compared to the Suez Canal route. With over 200 megaships making this passage monthly, that rerouting creates over 1.4 billion additional ton-miles almost overnight.

Similar leaps in ton-mile demand are playing out on other international trades too as ships sidestep regional hotspots. This should support firmer spot and time charter rates as more vessels chase after the lucrative longer-haul routes.

Costs outweigh the upsides

However, the downsides for shipping firms currently outweigh the revenue boost from ballooning ton-mile demand.

Insurance premiums for Red Sea transits have surged tenfold, adding huge costs even for Cape diversions. Extra fuel, canal fees and crew wages for lengthened journeys also erode gains from higher spot rates.

Ship speeds may increase to catch up on lost time, inflating fuel consumption further. And reducing round voyage frequency strains schedules integrity, asset utilization and service reliability.

Port congestion as diverted megaships overwhelm transshipment hubs presents further headaches. The lack of schedule integrity also risks leaving empty containers stranded far from origin ports.

An Uncertain Outlook

The economic outlook depends greatly on restoring maritime security in the Red Sea and convincing shipping companies to resume sailings. But the naval deterrence show of force has yet to stop Houthi attacks.

Without a ceasefire or peace deal to end Yemen’s civil war, the rebel faction seems unlikely to abandon this new pressure point which reaps global headlines. Iran also wants to stress Saudi Arabia and other Gulf rivals.

But even without direct strikes, the spectra of conflict and sanctions will keep insurance rates elevated. Shipping companies need those perceived risks to fade before committing valuable assets into the breach.

That reality promises more supply chain troubles ahead. Yet the crisis also reveals our interconnected dependence on fragile chokepoints like the Red Sea and Suez Canal. Perhaps smarter contingency planning and route flexibility could mitigate future shocks.

Either way, the Red Sea artery remains too crucial for global stability and prosperity to keep hemorrhaging like this indefinitely. The economic impacts are already spiraling widely through trade, consumers, and industries. Resolution may prove difficult but cannot wait much longer.

302 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page